Reducing child support payments to wife as a method of repayment for transportation expenses owed to husband was an abuse of discretion under the circumstances.  Faris v. Faris 
 The circuit court correctly denied an increase in support where the record was devoid of evidence of the other’s expenses for the child at the time of the original decree, and where she did not even attempt to itemize the individual factors underlying her determination of the amount she spent per month.  Harner v. Harner
 The summer camp provision unambiguously required defendant to pay the entire amount of the expenses, therefore, that portion of the trial court order which required defendant to pay only 60% of future summer camp tuition was reversed.  In re Roth
 Where divorced wife received an increase in child support from $60.00 a week to 34% of divorced husband’s monthly income of $1,600, a new hearing was required since such an increase was not supported by the evidence as the trial court over emphasized percentage of income formula and the financial situation of the divorced spouses was not suitably determined.  In re Cooper
 Considering the husband’s monthly income, with both the required and optional deductions plus the tax benefits he received, the monthly family support awarded was neither against the manifest weight of the evidence nor an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, where the husband testified that he earned a base salary of $60,000 per year; in 1976 he also received a bonus of $600 in addition to his base salary; the wife was a registered nurse prior to their marriage but terminated such employment shortly after the marriage; the parties had been married for approximately 20 years, during which time the husband advanced himself in business while the wife devoted herself to maintaining a home and raising the couple’s children and her maximum expected salary was $11,000 per year.  Schuppe v. Schuppe
 An award of $550 per month in child support payments was not unjustified where it was adduced that since entry of the decree plaintiff had remarried and shared a home with her spouse and child; plaintiff retained a live-in housekeeper at a salary of $80 per week; the plaintiff’s itemized monthly expenses for the child were as follows: food: $111; medical: $17.77; clothes: $85; allowance: $4.25; entertainment: $6.40; gifts for friends: $6; vacations: $58; tutoring: $46; haircuts: $5; summer camp expenses were $425 and tennis and art lessons totaled $335 per year; plaintiff was a licensed real estate salesperson and prior to the date of the hearing had earned $11,800 from that endeavor, and plaintiff also realized approximately $30,000 from the sale of the marital home.  Winter v. Winter
Support